CancerTYPE ID® for CUP Diagnosis
CancerTYPE ID® from Lab21What is CUP?How to Order
CancerTYPE ID® Test



CancerTYPE ID® is a molecular classification test that measures and integrates the expression of 92 genes in
formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour samples and is able to classify 54 different tumour types (Erlander et al, Greco et al) to help identify the origin of cancers with unknown or uncertain primary site. CancerTYPE ID® is available exclusively from Lab21 in the UK and Ireland.



CancerTYPE ID®:

  • Guides differential diagnosis and classification of the primary cancer site
  • Aids selection of the most appropriate treatment regimen
  • Has high overall sensitivity of ≥85% and specificity of 100%
  • Covers 95% of solid tumour types
  • Is an ideal adjunct to current diagnostic processes
Clinical situations where this clinically validated test may be useful include:

  • When the diagnosis is cancer of unknown or uncertain primary
  • When determining whether a cancer is a distant metastasis or a new primary
  • When addressing a differential diagnosis with two or more choices, each with a different treatment
  • When diagnosis cannot be confirmed using conventional methods alone
  • When the diagnosis may have implications for family members with hereditary cancers
CancerTYPE ID® is reimbursed by leading private medical insurance companies in the UK.



The test is performed at bioTheranostics, a CLIA and CAP accredited service laboratory located in San Diego, US.



Lab21 takes care of Test Requests, Customer Support, Sample Logistics and reporting of the Results.



Tumour types classified by CancerTYPE ID®




CancerTYPE ID® classifies 54 different tumour types from FFPE samples. Please click below to see tumour types included.



CancerTYPE ID® Brochure



Differential diagnosis by CancerTYPE ID®  



CancerTYPE ID® is an excellent tool in aiding differential diagnosis between 2 or more possible cancer types. Please click below for examples.



Examples of differential diagnosis



Performance and clinical evaluation of CancerTYPE ID®



Performance of CancerTYPE ID® (
Erlander et al) to classify 30 main tumour types and 54 subtypes:

  • Overall sensitivity 87% for main cancer types
  • Overall sensitivity 85% for cancer subtypes
  • Specificity 100%
  • N = 2,206
In an earlier study, the performance of CancerTYPE ID® was evaluated in CUP patients who had latent primary site clinically identified later in life (Greco et al):

  • Included 20 metastatic cancer patients who had no detectable primary site of origin identified following standard clinical and pathologic - including IHC—workup, but who had a latent primary tumor site clinically identified later in life
  • Tissue of origin predicted by CancerTYPE ID® was compared to the actual primary site identified clinically
  • In 53% of the cases, CancerTYPE ID® prediction had the potential to change treatment


  • Treatment outcomes in patients with CUP of colorectal origin



    A study by Hainsworth JD et al, 2011 describes the use of CancerTYPE ID® as an aid to select optimal therapy in CUP patients whose cancer was found to be of colorectal origin. The number of patients limited the power of the study, but the results were very encouraging:



    • Site-directed therapy: 50% response rate, 8.5 month median progression-free survival
    • Empirical CUP therapy: 17% response rate, and 6 month median progression-free survival


    Median survival in patients receiving site-directed therapy was 27 months. This was similar to that reported for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and differs from the median survival of 8-11 months produced by current empirical regimens for CUP.




    Use CancerTYPE ID® when IHC does not provide the answer


Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CUP tumour samples can suggest the primary cancer type in some patients, but often it is not specific for a single tumour type (Greco et al). CancerTYPE ID® can help pinpoint the exact primary cancer type.



Case studies




Click below to view:



UK Case Study 1: Joanne



Case Study 1: Resolving a differential diagnosis of metastatic malignant melanoma or malignant fibrous histiocytoma



Case Study 2: Resolving an uncertain diagnosis of adenocarcinoma favouring gastrointestinal origin



Case Study 3: Resolving a differential diagnosis of colorectal or pancreatic adenocarcinoma



Case Study 4: Distinguishing between recurrent breast cancer or a new primary adenocarcinoma
    Integration of CancerTYPE ID® into the cancer classification process

     







    References


    1. Hainsworth JD, Schnabel CA, Erlander MG et al. A retrospective study of treatment outcomes in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site and a colorectal cancer molecular profile. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011 (10.1016/j.clcc.2011.08.001).
    2. Erlander MG, Ma X-J, Kesty NC et al. Performance and Clinical Evaluation of the 92-Gene Real-Time PCR Assay for Tumor Classification. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2011; 13 (5): 493-503.
    3. Greco et al. Molecular Profiling in Unknown Primary Cancer: Accuracy of Tissue of Origin Prediction. The Oncologist, 2010; 15: 500-506.
    4. McGee RS, Kesty NC, Erlander MG and Schnabel CA. Molecular tumor classification using a 92-gene assay in the differential diagnosis of squamous cell lung cancer. Community Oncology, 2010; 8(3): 123-131.
    5. Ma, et al. Molecular Classification of Human Cancers Using a 92-Gene Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2006: 130: 465-473.
    Please note that Lab21 is not responsible for the content of any external websites.

    Other Services


    Colorectal Cancer


    Lung Cancer

    Breast and Ovarian Cancer

    Cancer of Unknown Primary

    Skin Cancer
    More

    );